91茄子

Change needed as academic careers ‘steadily lose their appeal’

European universities urged to re-evaluate structures and support for employees after ‘profound’ shifts in jobs market

May 27, 2025
Graduation cap on ground among leaves
Source: iStock/Gerville

An academic career – once considered “highly desirable” with “many perks and a robust future” – is steadily losing its appeal, a new report has warned.

“Profound” shifts in demographics, higher education participation and graduation rates, and funding streams for research, innovation and education has resulted in academic careers changing across Europe, “both in terms of their perception and their reality”, according to the paper from the European University Association (EUA).

The representative group called on its 800 members to implement reform, based around five principles for “attractive and sustainable” careers in academia.

Pointing to building pressures including funding cuts, precarious contracts and growing workplaces, EUA vice-president Ivanka Popovi? writes in the report’s foreword that early-career academics in particular are “increasingly questioning whether universities can offer them attractive, long-term employment”.

91茄子

ADVERTISEMENT

“At the same time, universities themselves are breaking down walls and opening up to more flexible and permeable career paths, for example by hiring personnel from outside the university sector,” she continues.

“All of these developments necessitate a re-evaluation of how academic careers are structured and supported, in order to ensure they remain attractive and sustainable in the long term.”

91茄子

ADVERTISEMENT

The principles identified by the EUA are: opportunities for professional development; diversity and inclusivity; a balance of competition and collegiality; investment in early-career academics; and “societal embeddedness”.

Institutions should establish “clearly elaborated and communicated” professional development policies, the EUA recommends, as well as “fair and clear” policies for the recognition of academic achievement. To avoid “unnecessary precarity”, the umbrella body adds, universities should offer “competitive contracts and salaries, as well as appropriate appointment and promotion procedures based on a broad and balanced set of assessment criteria”.

Universities should ensure that access to academic careers is “permeable, equitable and inclusive”, employing a broad range of evaluation criteria to “adequately acknowledge the contributions of diverse academic profiles to the achievement of the university’s goals”. Establishing flexible career paths, meanwhile, could better enable researchers to transition between academia, industry and the public sector.

Although some competition “is necessary to achieve academic quality”, the EUA report says, universities should aim to create “an ambitious yet supportive academic culture”, achievable through the recognition of academic citizenship and leadership and the provision of “continuous support” from the university across all stages of the academic career.

91茄子

ADVERTISEMENT

For early-career researchers, institutions should aim to be “more creative and less risk-averse in providing long-term career opportunities”, says the EUA, while maintaining “clear and transparent career paths, with honest information, merit-based criteria and equal opportunities”. The university group also urged institutions to ensure reasonable workloads for early-career scholars in order to avoid burnout.

To fulfil the final principle, “societal embeddedness”, universities should encourage the alignment of academic careers with the institution’s societal goals, investing in internal services such as human resources and training programmes to do so. Societal impact and outreach should also form a key component of career assessment, the EUA says.

Universities cannot resolve academic precarity alone, Popovi? acknowledged in a statement, adding that the “attractiveness and adequacy of academic careers depends to a considerable degree on adequate funding, which depends on external factors that are beyond the immediate control of universities”.

However, she added that there are many actions that universities could take to ensure the academic career path remains attractive.

91茄子

ADVERTISEMENT

emily.dixon@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (11)

The problem with academic careers is not about "Universities should ensure that access to academic careers is “permeable, equitable and inclusive”, employing a broad range of evaluation criteria to “adequately acknowledge the contributions of diverse academic profiles to the achievement of the university’s goals”. Establishing flexible career paths, meanwhile, could better enable researchers to transition between academia, industry and the public sector." It comes down to a very simple formula. In the past an academic career reflected a simple trade off -- academics are people willing to trade money for time and freedom, while those in the 'real' world trade off time and freedom for money. Having been in academia for 40 years, I have lived through the loss of freedom and time in terms of an overly invasive administrative bureaucracy (usually led by failed academics) and a total gutting of any support structure -- we have effectively become our own secretaries, TAs and RAs (when I first started as an academic there was one support staff for every 8 assistant professors and one per every 4 professors, in my department today there are two people for over 80 academics and their role is mainly to tell us what we have to do an monitor us). So the reality of the situation is that the tradeoff of freedom and time for money is one where we now no longer have freedom or time but still have to give up money. When I was interviewed a few years ago by a group of doctoral students and junior faculty about academic careers, I was asked what I would do differently if I was starting again now -- I was quick to respond that I would not have become an academic. My original plan to do a JD/MBA would have provided me with a fulfilling career with no more stress, no less freedom and no less time, as well as a lot more money.
Sadly, well said. The micromanaging of teaching, of assessment, of course and programme structuring, of supervision, of grant writing and grant management, everything has gone to the extreme, and it sucks up too much time.
Nonsense. This meme amongst academics that they're all "giving up money" for their academic careers is utter rubbish. If you'd all be so much better paid outside of academia, then why not go and do just that? Answers are either 1) because it's not true, or 2) because they'd never manage to get a job outside of their ivory towers. As for the whinging about support staff, academics really need to make up their minds. Are Universities over-stuffed with waste-of-space PS staff who are the cause of the sector's malaise? Or are PS staff cut to the bone to the point where academics have to do all the admin work themselves? Please work out which it is amongst yourselves and then try to be consistent about it.
Many academics are indeed voting with their feet.
new
The point about support staff (who are often not treated with sufficient respect) is a fair one. In terms of ' you'd all be so much better paid outside of academia, then why not go and do just that?' you seem to be asking your question to those who stay whereas in practice many, many have left.
All that everyone says about academia being less attractive than it used to be is true, but I don't think early career people should ignore that the alternatives have also gotten less attractive. While its true universities now struggle to provide long term secure employement, it is also the case that employment in the traditional private second. None of the people I know in the private sector stay in one job for more than 3 years these days.
Academic careers are extremely unappealing certainly in the UK. There’s only one person out of my PhD cohort who has an academic job full-time and that simply because they needed it for their visa. The rest of us either never went into it in the first place or gave it up after the pandemic because of the conditions described in the first comment. Because I live in London, I am unfortunately able to continue to do academic research in order to publish which I do although I’m very aware that I’m doing this really for my own intellectual pleasure and not for “career advancement” I do wonder about PhD graduates living outside of London who really don’t have access to research materials anymore. The minute you graduate you’re usually more or less ejected from all of the research libraries and systems unless you have an academic job even a part-time academic job doesn’t usually allow you full access. It seems kind of insane for the research councils to fund people to do PhD’s and not continue to give them access to their research materials but hey ho this is the circus and the clowns are in charge
*fortunarelt
Academia is unattractive because the bureaucrats aim to fill up the academic's day with endless meetings, report writing, non teaching student activities, Away Days, IT trouble shooting meetings- the list is endless. Time for research is gradually dwindling including over summer when staff traditionally had time to do research. Next year will be worse.
The real pay for acdemics is is cut every single year while the workload increases every year. The bureaucaracy is out of control. The senior managers multiply and all it does is lead to more silly strategies, bureaucracy, meeting and wasted time. Academic pay in the UK is now a joke.
Could you please send the link to the paper from the European University Association (EUA)?

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT