91茄子

Plymouth says 200 roles at risk as Newcastle cuts further 38 jobs

Yet more universities announce job cuts amid ‘financially challenging environment’

May 9, 2025
University of Plymouth campus
Source: Source: iStock/Matt Stansfield

The University of Plymouth and Newcastle University are both pushing ahead with redundancy plans, as the English sector’s financial crisis shows little sign of abating.?

Plymouth has?confirmed plans which could see up to 200 roles at risk of redundancy, after it said it had seen a 10 per cent decline in its income.

The university?said that the number of roles at risk is “subject to change as we consult with colleagues and trade unions”, and it is “doing everything we can to make savings and avoid compulsory redundancies, whilst protecting the quality of our student experience, which is our number one priority”.

A?spokesperson continued: “Along with the rest of the UK’s higher education sector, the University of Plymouth is operating in a very financially challenging environment. Thanks to careful financial management and planning, Plymouth is well placed to weather the storm, but we’ve seen increases to costs that are outside of our control combined with a 10 per cent drop in income, so we must act now to cut budgets.”

91茄子

ADVERTISEMENT

The news follows a “sobering” report from the Office for Students?which found that 43 per cent of English universities are facing a financial deficit this year, after their performance lagged behind initial forecasts.

Meanwhile in the north-east, Newcastle University said it is pressing ahead with 38 redundancies, despite having achieved three-quarters of its savings target through its voluntary scheme.

91茄子

ADVERTISEMENT

The provider had announced earlier this year that it was looking to cut 300 roles as it looked to save ?20 million from its staff cuts.

But the University and College Union (UCU) branch, which has been on strike over the previously announced cuts, said that the university had achieved ?15.8 million of savings already, with the remaining sum constituting just over half a per cent of the university’s annual income.

A Newcastle University spokesperson said it was seeking to “safeguard our long-term future” and while it has “achieved the majority of the savings needed” through its voluntary severance scheme and other savings, it still has a shortfall of ?3.8 million.

“Regrettably, this means we must now move forward with the next phase, which will affect around 38 roles, and we are making every effort to achieve this through voluntary redundancy with an offer of an enhanced package. Our proposals for further savings will preserve the breadth of our research and education, avoiding subject closures, and we are consulting with our trade unions to avoid compulsory redundancies wherever possible,” they said.

91茄子

ADVERTISEMENT

Matt Perry, branch chair of Newcastle University UCU, said the cuts will “damage” the university’s reputation, and said the university’s executive board “have refused to take responsibility for their failed strategy”.?

He added: “This is the same story as many, many universities; the damage to a world-leading sector of the UK economy will be difficult to repair.”?

David Bates, secretary of Newcastle University UCU, added: “This news will come as a devastating blow to our hard-working members. Already we have spoken to staff who are in tears about potentially losing their job. We will not give up the fight: an injury to one is an injury to all.”

juliette.rowsell@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (7)

Err so 38 jobs to go. So cut them in the failed senior management team. Simples.
It is so disappointing that the senior leadership team at Newcastle University has failed to take any accountability for the University's financial problems. Yes, times are tough as a result of government decisions (real-terms cuts to tuition income, stricter visas for international students and national insurance hikes) as well as high inflation. However, money was spent hand-over-fist on shiny glass estates and many other unnecessary luxuries in the 'good times' ... evidently without adequate contingency planning for leaner times. Where was the 'strategic leadership' and 'horizon scanning' they like to talk about? It seems that was all (highly remunerated) bluster.
We all say this over and over again and point to the same story over and over again, but no-one seems to do anything about it. The senior management will not admit it of course and they deflect the issue in all sorts of ways. Indeed, they cannot probably conceptualise the narrative as it would entail their mass resignation and apologies to the sector and the taxpayer. There are many good senior managers of course but they have all bought into the same ideology and self fashioning. The saddest ting of all is they are carrying on with the same groupthink mentality and all doing more or less the same thing as each other, presumably thinking if they all do it it must be right. I do think, however, that the message is getting though to the various governments in the UK and notice is finally been taken.
It seems obvious that these places have been very badly managed. So why are the senior managers still in place?
We don't seem to have got to CRs yet in the sector as far as I know though I stand to be corrected as always. Is a lot of the rhetoric I guess was fashioned to intimidate and threaten. Yet a stonking number of jobs have gone through VSS and targeted VR. In practice, is there any real difference between VSS, VR, CR apart from a few quid in the payoff? People are still losing their jobs, many of whom were not wishing to go. It seems now that thousands of colleagues are leaving the sector and have left. I wonder how institutions are going to absorb this loss and function next academic year? And of course, it is the rank and file, as it were, who are going, the foot soldiers who have to fight not the Field Marshalls and their general staff,
The work will be reallocated to the remaining rank and file foot soldiers. It is already happening under guise of bigger class sizes are better for teaching large cohorts. The worst is yet to come. Meanwhile, the Field Marshalls are off to open new campuses abroad. A sad state of affairs.
Well I think you are right but then these new campus have not got off the ground as yet. I am pretty sceptical of all that tbh. How is Cardiff's new Kazakhstan campus going for example? I read this recently: referring to the partner organisation in Astana as a private body apparently set up by Kazakh entrepreneurs, Private Eye states: “It has no track record of any kind, describing the Cardiff scheme as its ‘first step’ towards improving top-tier education in the country. “QCEPF executive director Kuanysh Kuchekbayev, the only individual named on the organisation’s website, is described as a seasoned leader from, er, the construction and logistics industries. There’s vanishingly little other information available about his credentials, and his LinkedIn account lists his role at QCEPF and nothing else." Oh dear Wendy! And it's all supposed to be paid for by the oil revenues which are not so buoyant any more.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT